The last time I remember people being this concerned about nuclear war was during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Back then, in school, we were taught duck and cover—basically, dive under a desk, cover your head, and wait it out.
At the time, we didn’t question it, but looking back now, it seems a little naive. I can’t help but wonder what the teachers thought about giving us such advice.
In Washington State, I’ve previously looked into areas you’d want to avoid if something like a nuclear attack happened. For instance, staying far from places like the Hanford Reservation, military bases, airports, or tech hubs would be wise.
Recently, however, a new map has been circulating, not about places to avoid but about places where you’d want to be. Unfortunately for us Washingtonians, the safest spots aren’t in this state.
According to MSN, some real estate experts suggest that if you’re house-hunting, you might want to consider locations that would be safer during a nuclear apocalypse. These areas are typically rural, with warm climates, access to water, and farmland.
Andrew Ragusa, CEO of REMI Realty in Long Island, recommends choosing a home in wide-open spaces, far from military or tech installations, and near natural resources like water.
He suggests that homebuyers rethink their priorities—safety over convenience like good schools or nearby shopping.
As for me, I’m staying put. I like where I live, and honestly, I believe World War 3 is still a distant possibility.