Indiana Governor Mike Braun’s recent decision to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion DEI practices in state government has sparked mixed reactions, with supporters of the move arguing for merit-based systems, while critics warn it could worsen systemic inequalities.
Braun’s executive order prohibits state agencies from supporting DEI programs that give preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity, or other factors. The new directive will replace DEI with MEI—standing for Merit, Excellence, and Innovation—in an attempt to create a more inclusive and fair approach, according to the governor’s office.
Critics, including State Rep. Earl Harris Jr., chair of the Indiana Black Legislative Caucus, argue that the timing of this move is ill-conceived, especially with pressing issues like healthcare, housing, and property taxes facing the state.
Harris also expressed concern that eliminating DEI could lead to a less welcoming environment for diverse populations, potentially harming the state’s ability to retain and attract talent. “Indiana is a place where we want to make it welcoming,” Harris stated, cautioning that dismantling DEI would reduce the appeal for diverse individuals to live and work in the state.
Rupal Thanawala, president of the Asian American Alliance, voiced concerns about potential negative consequences, such as an increase in hate crimes, though she acknowledged that the Asian American community has not significantly benefited from the state’s DEI budget. Despite this, Thanawala stressed that her organization would continue its DEI initiatives, irrespective of state-level changes.
The long-term impact of the policy shift remains uncertain, and agencies have until April 30 to review and modify their DEI practices to comply with the new policy.
The controversy surrounding the elimination of DEI highlights broader debates over how best to achieve equality and inclusivity while addressing systemic challenges. Advocates for DEI argue that diversity remains critical to creating a thriving, innovative society, while proponents of MEI stress the need for merit-based systems that do not prioritize race or ethnicity.