Former Senator Menendez Seeks New Trial Citing Evidence Breach

Former Sen. Bob Menendez has requested a new trial following his conviction on bribery and corruption charges, arguing that the jury was exposed to evidence that should have been excluded. Menendez’s defense team claims this breach warrants vacating the verdict.

The issue centers on nine exhibits shown to the jury during deliberations, which contained unredacted information barred by a court order. Menendez’s lawyers contend that this evidence improperly linked him to military aid for Egypt, a key component of the charges.

The defense asserts that the unintentional error by the government significantly prejudiced the jury against their client, despite its exclusion under the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Monteleoni previously informed the court about the error but argued that it did not necessitate action, claiming the defendants had inspected the exhibits and that there was no evidence the jury reviewed the inadmissible content.

Menendez’s team countered, arguing they were given insufficient time to review nearly 3,000 exhibits and reasonably trusted the government to comply with court orders.

The defense maintains that without a new trial, the government’s mistake undermines fairness and could encourage future lapses. Menendez, 70, resigned from the Senate following his conviction and is scheduled for sentencing in January. If granted, a new trial could reshape the legal battle surrounding the former senator.

Leave a Comment